Bank of Ireland Launches Ireland’s Tax Benefits Finder Service

Bank of Ireland has launched its new Benefits Finder tool, an innovative service in Ireland that helps customers identify tax credits and reliefs they may be missing out on. The AI-enabled digital tool is available to customers to use free of charge through the Benefits Finder app on Bank of Ireland’s website.

The service is designed to strengthen financial resilience by ensuring customers are claiming tax credits and reliefs that they are legitimately entitled to. According to Red C research conducted by the Bank, despite strong awareness of tax benefits, around one in seven people (16%) in Ireland have never claimed tax back and think they could be eligible. Revenue is urging taxpayers to use its systems to claim millions of euro they are owed in refunds.

So far this year, Revenue has paid out €637m in tax refunds to well over half-a-million taxpayers. Data from Revenue states that over 500,000 people missed out on refunds in 2024 alone, leaving an estimated €389 million unclaimed. The average refund is a substantial €900.

Aine McCleary, Chief Customer Officer, Bank of Ireland said: “Helping our customers build real financial resilience means going beyond the basics. Our research showed that there is an understanding gap among some consumers when it comes to claiming benefits. So, while around three quarters of the population have claimed a tax benefit, more regular claimants tend to be those who are already more financially stable. 

“Tools like Benefits Finder can help to bridge this gap by making it easier for people to discover what they’re entitled to have.  This meets a genuine customer need, and helps to build financial resilience in practical terms, potentially putting hundreds or even thousands of euros back in their pockets.  Taking these simple steps to avail of all entitlements can help to build financial buffers, as even a modest cushion can significantly improve resilience.”

Claiming tax benefits is done through the Revenue.ie PAYE tax portal, MyAccount, with the majority (68%) of regular claimants stating that they find the process easy.

Barriers to claiming still remain high

  • 42% of non-claimants say they’re unsure what they can claim for
  • 33% don’t know they’re entitled to claim back for
  • 32% say they simply don’t know how to go about it
  • 36% of those who claim tax back do this intermittently, every few years, versus regularly

The Benefits Finder tool addresses these gaps by offering a simple, guided experience that takes just minutes to complete.

Claiming tax back should be an annual routine. Even for people that have claimed back before, only half of those surveyed do it every yearWe want to help make that a reality,” added Aine McCleary.

Try the Benefits Finder tool today at Benefits Finder – Bank of Ireland

Financial Institutions Turn to Decision Intelligence as AI Strategies Evolve

The financial services sector is entering a new phase of transformation, driven not just by automation but by the need for smarter, continuously improving decisions. After years of investing in AI to increase efficiency, organisations are now focusing on how those decisions perform over time and how they can be refined in real time.

Findings from the Provenir 2026 Global Decisioning Survey highlight the scale of this shift. 77% of senior decision-makers say decision intelligence will be very valuable to their strategy over the next two to three years. 

At the same time, 60% of organisations plan to invest in AI or embedded intelligence for decisioning in 2026, making it their top investment priority. The momentum is clear, with 75% already collaborating on AI-driven decision intelligence initiatives and a further 18% exploring partnerships.

From Automation to Continuous Improvement

Traditional AI approaches in financial services have focused on automation and efficiency. Models are deployed, results are measured periodically, and updates are made on a scheduled basis. While this has delivered operational gains, it often lacks the responsiveness required in today’s environment.

Decision Intelligence introduces a different model. It enables organisations to execute decisions at scale, measure outcomes continuously, and optimise performance in real time. Instead of relying on quarterly updates, firms can refine strategies based on live data and evolving conditions.

Interest in this approach is growing rapidly. 66% of organisations say they are very interested in using AI for strategy implementation and optimisation. This reflects a shift from using AI as a tool for execution to using it as a driver of strategic decision-making.

What Organisations Are Prioritising

As financial institutions adopt more advanced AI capabilities, their priorities are changing. The focus is moving beyond basic automation toward features that improve accessibility, speed, and transparency.

Natural language interaction is one of the most valued capabilities. 51% of organisations highlight the ability to use generative AI for natural language queries as a key feature. Overall, 92% say it is important to interact with data quickly using conversational interfaces, with 62% describing this as very important and 30% as moderately important.

This shift allows a broader range of users to engage with AI systems. Business teams, executives, and compliance staff can all access insights without relying on technical specialists.

Real-time decisioning is another priority, with 49% of organisations highlighting its importance. The ability to respond instantly across customer touchpoints helps improve consistency and reduce operational complexity.

Transparency is also critical. 50% of respondents say explainability of AI models is a top requirement, reflecting the need to justify decisions to regulators and stakeholders. In addition, 47% emphasise the importance of integrating AI with existing systems and data sources, rather than replacing infrastructure entirely.

Measurable Business Benefits

The adoption of Decision Intelligence is delivering tangible results across multiple areas of the business.

Operational efficiency is the most widely cited benefit, with 62% of organisations reporting improvements. Automated decision-making reduces manual intervention, accelerates processes, and lowers costs while maintaining consistency.

Customer experience is also improving. 52% of organisations say faster decisions and more personalised interactions are enhancing customer journeys. In a competitive market, the ability to deliver seamless and responsive experiences is increasingly important.

Model accuracy is another key area of impact. Approximately 58% of organisations report improvements in the accuracy of their models and strategies. Continuous learning allows systems to adapt and refine predictions over time.

The speed of innovation is also increasing. 56% of respondents say they can deploy new decision strategies more quickly, enabling them to respond to market changes and competitive pressures with greater agility.

A Continuous Decisioning Cycle

Organisations begin by shaping strategy based on real performance data. Decisions are then executed in real time across customer interactions, using data, context, and historical insights. Outcomes are measured and linked directly to key business metrics such as revenue, risk, and profitability.

The system then learns from these outcomes and refines strategies accordingly. This creates a self-improving cycle where each decision contributes to better future performance.

Expanding Access Through Natural Language

The growing importance of natural language interaction is transforming how organisations use AI. With 92% of firms prioritising this capability, it is becoming a central feature of modern decisioning platforms.

Natural language querying allows business users to explore data without needing technical skills. Executives can access insights instantly, operations teams can investigate issues in real time, and compliance teams can review decisions more effectively.

This broader access also helps address concerns around explainability. When more people can interact with AI systems and understand how decisions are made, transparency improves across the organisation.

Addressing Key Challenges

Decision Intelligence is helping organisations overcome several long-standing barriers to AI adoption.

Explainability is improved by providing clear visibility into how decisions are made and how they perform. Governance becomes more manageable when decisions are directly linked to business outcomes. Integration challenges are reduced through platforms that work with existing systems rather than replacing them.

Speed is another critical factor. Continuous optimisation allows organisations to respond more quickly to changing conditions, addressing challenges such as fraud detection, where 50% of firms cite speed as a major obstacle.

A Strategic Shift in Focus

The data points to a clear trend. Around 77% of organisations see Decision Intelligence as very valuable, 75% are already implementing it, 66% are interested in using AI for strategy optimisation, and 60% are planning further investment in 2026.

This represents a shift in how financial institutions view AI. Traditional approaches focused on speed and automation. Decision intelligence focuses on outcomes and continuous improvement.

As the industry evolves, organisations that build systems capable of learning and adapting over time will be better positioned to compete. The ability to make smarter decisions consistently and at scale is becoming a defining factor in long-term success.

SUPCASE – UB Pro Mag Series Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Cases Review

The SUPCASE – UB Pro Mag Series Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Cases are cases you need for you new expensive device and there is some serious cases on offer here from the brand.

The range for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is no different than other cases we have review for other devices and these will protect your device from all angles also there is some really cool colours to check out in the range.

From simple cases to more rugged cases SUPCASE has two here we checked out and I love the UB Pro Mag Series S26 Ultra MagSafe Phone Case with the upgraded Airbag & Military-Grade Drop Protection 20FT (6m) drop resistance with 40% enhanced cushioning, TPU+PC hybrid structure for ultimate anti-drop defense.

Again powerful magnets are on board and they still work with wireless charging you can rotate the device on the pouch which can clip to your jeans or shirt for example or just use the kickstand built in for media viewing, all ports are avaialable and the USB-C port covered. The buttons are also nice and tactile and no issues there and the front and rear of the device is fully protected, so your device can face down or rear down without the worry of getting scratches.

You get extra gripping power on these cases too and you can be rest assured if you drop your device you are going to be fine, check the full hands on video below for more.

UB Pro Mag Series S26 Ultra MagSafe Phone Case

  • Upgraded Airbag & Military-Grade Drop Protection: 20FT (6m) drop resistance with 40% enhanced cushioning, TPU+PC hybrid structure for ultimate anti-drop defense.
  • Powerful Magnetic Attraction: Built-in N52 magnets (1800g holding force) for MagSafe accessory compatibility & magnetic charging.

360° Rotating Belt Clip with 30° Opening Angle: Hands-free convenience for work or outdoor use.
  • Anti-Slip Texture Design: Comfortable anti-slip texture for secure grip.
  • Multi-Functional Kickstand: Adjustable angles with 55,000+ tested openings & dual use as a sturdy ring holder for hands-free convenience.
  • SUPCASE Guarantee: 12 months warranty service with hassle-free.

BUY

 

UB Pro Mag Series S26 Ultra MagSafe Phone Case – Brown

  • Upgraded Airbag & Military-Grade Drop Protection: 20FT (6m) drop resistance with 40% enhanced cushioning, TPU+PC hybrid structure for ultimate anti-drop defense.
  • Powerful Magnetic Attraction: Built-in N52 magnets (1800g holding force) for MagSafe accessory compatibility & magnetic charging.

360° Rotating Belt Clip with 30° Opening Angle: Hands-free convenience for work or outdoor use.
  • Anti-Slip Texture Design: Comfortable anti-slip texture for secure grip.
  • Multi-Functional Kickstand: Adjustable angles with 55,000+ tested openings & dual use as a sturdy ring holder for hands-free convenience.
  • SUPCASE Guarantee: 12 months warranty service with hassle-free.

BUY

Other SUPCASE reviews

Video Review

Loftie Launches Loftie+ Habit System to Help People Put Their Phones Down

Loftie, maker of the award-winning alarm clock that replaces the smartphone on the nightstand, today launches Loftie+ — a behaviour-change system built to change habits, not track data.

Over half of UK and Irish adults stay up later than planned because of their phones — rising to 73% of 18- to 24-year-olds in the UK (Deloitte, 2024). The sleep industry’s answer: sell people a tracker and a score.

“The sleep industry is obsessed with measurement,” said Matt Hassett, founder and CEO of Loftie. “People are staring at a dozen numbers every morning trying to figure out why they feel terrible — while the phone that’s wrecking their sleep is the same device giving them the score. We’re not interested in adding more data. We’re interested in helping you put the phone down.”

Loftie+ is a mobile app (£9.99/€9.99 monthly or £59.99/€59.99 yearly) that works on its own — no Loftie hardware required. It combines nightly app blocking, daytime focus tools, and screen-time challenges, plus a credit card-sized Loftie Card for your wallet and a free browser extension.

At night: the app schedules blocking around sleep in three phases — Relax, Sleep, and Rise — guiding users from wind-down to wake-up with minimal phone interference.

During the day: the Loftie Card triggers Focus mode with a single tap — at your desk, before a meeting, when the kids get home. Unlike screen-time apps that stay on a shelf at home, the Card lives in your wallet, with you wherever you need to focus.

A free home screen widget, Flip, replaces your phone’s app grid with just the apps you choose — no icons, no distractions.

Loftie+ builds on a platform serving over 15,000 members across curated audio, personalised bedtime stories, and wind-down routines. For Loftie hardware owners, an optional feature called Loftie Drift blocks selected apps automatically when you enter the bedroom, using Bluetooth from your Clock or Lamp.

Loftie+ is available now on iOS and Android across the UK and EU. The browser extension and Flip are free.

About Loftie

Loftie is a sleep wellness brand designing products that help people put their phones down — for deeper sleep at night and better focus by day. The line includes the Loftie Clock, Loftie Lamp, and Loftie+. The Loftie Clock has been named a TIME Best Invention, recommended by Wirecutter five years running, and is carried at MoMA Design Store, Goop, and URBN.

Good game UI rarely draws attention to itself, which is good.

When players notice it, it’s most likely because something went wrong: menus slow down the game pacing, unclear contextual hints, or unintuitive controls.

A well-designed UI does not draw attention to itself: it naturally integrates into the game’s aesthetic, supports gameplay, and clearly communicates the rules.

To understand how to make game UI a logical extension of the gameplay, you need to understand what UI is and how it overlaps with UX.

What Is UI In Games

UI in games covers everything the player uses to understand and interact with the game system.

HUDs, menus, maps, icons, inventory screens — elements that explain what is happening on screen and available actions at any given moment. Game UI is how the game communicates with the player.

What sets game UI apart from standard software is context. It has to work in motion, often under time pressure, while the player is already processing visuals, audio, and input. 

In fast-paced games, the interface must support split-second decisions rather than compete with them. Because balancing visual hierarchy with technical performance is a specialized craft, many developers entrust this work to an experienced game UI design agency to refine how their systems communicate with players under pressure.

Key Elements Of Game UI

Most game UI elements fall into a few core categories, but they only work when treated as a single system. Designing them in isolation often leads to cluttered screens or unclear priorities once everything comes together.

  • Visual hierarchy is the foundation. 

Players should immediately recognize what matters most (health, ammo, objectives, etc.) without scanning the screen. When hierarchy is weak, players spend time searching for information instead of reacting, which directly slows gameplay.

  • Consistency builds on that foundation.

Icons, colors, typography, and interaction patterns need to behave the same way across the interface. When they do, players learn faster and rely on muscle memory rather than conscious effort. When they don’t, even simple actions start to feel unreliable.

  • Feedback and responsiveness close the loop.
    Every input should trigger a clear response. Without visible feedback, players are left guessing whether the game registered their intent, which quickly erodes trust in the controls.
  • Readability and accessibility should take priority over visual trends. 

Text size, contrast, icon clarity, and color choices must hold up across TVs, monitors, and handheld screens, and in different lighting conditions. If players can’t read or interpret the UI quickly, no amount of stylistic polish will compensate.

How It Mixes With UX

Game UI and UX are closely linked:

  • UI deals with what players see on screen.
  • UX focuses on how those visuals influence understanding, decision-making, and behavior over time.

In games, UX choices determine when information appears, how systems are introduced, and how much the player is asked to process at once. UI turns those choices into something readable and usable within the flow of play. 

A visually impressive but cluttered HUD, for example, may look detailed while actively harming UX by overwhelming new players at the wrong moment.

Good game UI is built around attention management. It brings critical information forward when it matters and fades into the background when it does not. Balance between visibility and restraint is where UI design directly supports a strong player experience.

How To Design UI For Video Games

Designing UI for video games starts with understanding the game itself and the player experience it aims to create.

Understand The Game

Before sketching layouts or choosing visual styles, a UI designer needs clarity on genre, pacing, and core mechanics. A tactical strategy game, a fast-paced shooter, and a casual mobile title place very different demands on the player, and the interface has to reflect that.

A few key questions help set direction:

  • What decisions do players make most often? 
  • What information must be visible at a glance? 
  • When does speed matter more than detail? 

The answers shape how much information the UI carries, how it is prioritized, and how quickly players are expected to react. Without this groundwork, even well-crafted interfaces can feel mismatched to the game they serve.

Work Through The Components

Designing game UI is more effective when you think in components instead of full screens. Buttons, panels, sliders, indicators, tooltips, and pop-ups work best as reusable building blocks rather than one-off layouts. This approach reinforces consistency and makes iteration faster as the game evolves. 

When a rule changes or a system is rebalanced, updating a single component is easier than revisiting every screen. It also simplifies cross-platform adaptation. 

The same components can be adjusted for mouse, controller, or touch input, and scaled to fit everything from mobile displays to large TVs, without redesigning the interface from scratch.

Consider In Action Screens

UI should be tested in real gameplay. What looks clear on a clean screen can become unreadable during combat, fast movement, or flashy visual effects.

Designers need to observe how UI performs under actual conditions: does it block critical action, remain legible at different resolutions, and convey information when the player’s attention is elsewhere? 

Testing in action often uncovers issues invisible in theory, providing insights that guide adjustments to layout, size, and timing to keep the interface usable when it matters most.

Which Software Used For Game UI

Game UI creation relies on a mix of design and implementation tools, chosen to match the team’s workflow.

Design tools such as Sketch, Figma, and Adobe XD help layout screens, define reusable components, and prototype interactions early. They allow designers to test flows and refine interfaces before investing in full production assets.

For implementation, game engines like Unity and Unreal Engine provide built-in UI systems to translate those designs into functional interfaces. Photoshop and Illustrator remain essential for creating icons, textures, and other visual assets that populate the interface.

The most important factor isn’t the tool itself, but how well it supports iteration and collaboration. A tool that fits seamlessly into the team’s pipeline allows faster testing, easier updates, and more consistent UI across the game.

What Makes UI In Video Games Well

Effective game UI is clear, consistent, responsive, and aligned with gameplay. Players should never struggle to understand what is happening or how to act.

Creating UI that meets these standards requires experience. Designers must balance player behavior, technical constraints, platform differences, and visual principles all at once. When teams lack this expertise, common mistakes (confusing layouts, poor feedback, inconsistent elements) can lead to costly redesigns late in development. This is why, in most cases, development companies opt to outsource to specialized agencies. They bring much-needed expertise and experience to begin planning, testing, and ensuring UI complements the game instead of obstructing it. 

Final Thoughts

Game UI is the layer that shapes how players understand systems, make decisions, and stay immersed.

Clear hierarchy, consistent elements, responsive feedback, and thoughtful readability help players focus on the game, not the interface. Knowing what UI is, how it connects with UX, and how to design and test it effectively can reduce confusion, improve reactions, and enhance overall engagement.

From small mobile games to complex PC titles, investing in functional, well-tested UI pays off. Clear interfaces support better gameplay, and better gameplay keeps players coming back.

zens Semi Solid State Powerbank Review

The Zens Semi Solid State Powerbank delivers serious power in a remarkably thin design. Just 8 mm for 5,000 mAh and 14 mm for 10,000 mAh. We have tested the 5,00mAh here for this review. Thanks to the latest semi solid state battery technology, it stores more energy in less space without compromising performance. With fast 25W wireless charging, it is ideal for iPhone 16 series and up and we tested this out on the iPhone 17 pro over the last while. Compatible with iPhone 12 onwards, charging up to 15W. Charge two devices at once, and enjoy the peace of mind of always having enough battery, wherever your day takes you.
This next-generation powerbank combines semi solid state battery technology with Qi2.2 magnetic fast charging up to 25W for iPhone 16 and newer. Slim enough to carry anywhere, powerful enough to rely on every day. For those who need more capacity, Zens also introduces a 10,000 mAh version at 14 mm thin. Ideal for frequent top-ups throughout the day, while maintaining the same clean look and feel.

The semi solid state battery architecture enhances thermal stability, improves resistance to shock and temperature changes, and extends overall battery lifespan. The result is a lighter, more durable powerbank with a longer lifecycle. Qi2.2 certification ensures safe, reliable magnetic wireless charging. It also supports up to 15W for iPhone 12–15 and compatible Android devices.

The zens Semi Solid State powerbank is aesthetically pleasing to look at and hold and almost like a product Apple would make it has an excellent design and looks premium and is built to last.

Not adding much heft to your iPhone this is easy to carry on device full time and also works with cases on board too, some folk like to go caseless i do not and in either scenario this works fine and is not cumbersome even with a case on your phone.

Much like zens other charging products we have tested this again is high quality and robust and looks great giving them yet another product in their portfilio of tech that should be on your list, check the video below for more.

Key features:

  • World’s thinnest 5,000 mAh semi solid state powerbank at 8 mm
  • 10,000 mAh version at 14 mm for extended use
  • Qi2.2 wireless charging up to 25W (iPhone 16 and newer)
  • Up to 15W for iPhone 12–15 and compatible Android devices
  • Power Pass-Through: charge both your phone and powerbank overnight with one cable
  • Charge two devices at once
  • Enhanced durability and extended battery lifespan

The Zens Semi Solid State Powerbanks are available to-order via zens.tech and selected partners worldwide.

Shaping AI: What it should it do and for whom?

A new NESC report Artificial Intelligence in Service of Society: Navigating our way Forward emphasises that Ireland is currently in a critical window of opportunity. As AI becomes increasingly embedded across public services, workplaces and everyday life, now is the time to put the right foundations in place: strengthening skills, governance, infrastructure and public trust so that Ireland can realise the benefits of AI while minimising foreseeable risks and unintended consequences.
The report outlines that the goal should be to proactively shape AI, so that its benefits can be realised responsibly, equitably, and sustainably. Taking a broad socio-technical perspective, the report argues that AI is not merely a technological tool, but a transformation shaped by governance, institutional capacity and societal choices.
According to Dr Siobhán O’Sullivan, Senior Policy Analyst at NESC:
     There is a tendency to treat AI as a purely technical phenomenon—something to be evaluated on the basis of whether it works as designed. But that framing misses the most important questions. AI systems do not operate in a vacuum; they are embedded in organisations, workplaces, public services and communities, and their impacts emerge from that interaction. A socio-technical lens asks not only whether a system functions as intended, but who benefits, under what conditions, and at what cost. That shift in perspective is what moves us from asking what AI can do, to asking what it should do—and for whom.
 
The report sets out five interconnected priorities:
  • Responsible and Strategic Adoption: AI should address clearly defined public and organisational needs and align with workforce skills, data quality and institutional capacity.
  • Trustworthy and Ethical Practice: Systems must be transparent, accountable and subject to meaningful human oversight, translating ethical principles into real-world actions.
  • Anticipatory Governance: With AI evolving rapidly, regulation must be forward-looking, adaptive and based on continuous monitoring rather than reactive fixes.
  • AI Literacy as National Infrastructure: Building widespread understanding of AI is essential for workforce adaptation, democratic oversight and responsible use.
  • Public Legitimacy: Long-term success depends on securing public trust through inclusive engagement and sustained societal dialogue.
A central theme of the report is the requirement for AI systems to be safe, ethical and trustworthy in practice, not only in principle. AI systems are probabilistic and imperfect. Meaningful human control is essential to prevent over-reliance, loss of judgement and accountability gaps. High-level ethical principles must be translated into concrete practices with individuals and institutions building genuine ethical capability to ensure AI operates safely, fairly and effectively.
Among the report’s most significant findings is its designation of AI literacy as essential national infrastructure. Ireland has a growing ecosystem of AI literacy initiatives, but these remain fragmented, and significant gaps persist in public understanding. NESC calls for development of AI-literate citizens capable of questioning and scrutinising AI systems, and AI-literate senior leaders capable of providing effective organisational oversight—both of which are identified as preconditions for democratic accountability.
On governance, the report notes that the trajectory of AI capability remains genuinely uncertain, and that regulatory approaches must be agile, anticipatory and continuously updated. In line with the National Digital and AI Strategy, NESC argues that continuous monitoring is central—particularly given evidence gaps and the tendency for AI systems to behave differently in complex real-world environments than in controlled settings. Anticipatory governance enables policymakers to detect emerging risks early and respond proactively rather than reactively.
Dr Larry O’Connell, Director of NESC, noted that:
    The trajectory of AI capability is genuinely uncertain. We cannot predict with confidence what the technology will look like in five or ten years, which means governance designed only for today’s systems may be inadequate for tomorrows. Anticipatory governance gives us the tools to prepare for multiple possible futures — through strategic foresight, continuous monitoring and flexible regulatory approaches that can detect emerging risks early and respond proportionately. The goal is not to predict the future but to build the institutional resilience to navigate it, whatever form it takes.
 
To read the report in full please click here.

Price Shopping Without the Chaos: A Practical Method for Comparing Dental Supplies

Section 1: Start with a repeatable comparison method, not a one-off deal hunt

Most practices do not overspend on supplies because they never compare prices. They overspend because comparing prices is often done in a rushed, inconsistent way, usually right when something is running low. When that happens, the team defaults to whatever is fastest, not what is best. A structured approach to how to compare prices on dental supplies? begins by turning price shopping into a routine with clear rules so the practice is not reinventing the process every time an order is placed.

This post lays out an educational, step-by-step system for comparing supply costs without multiplying SKUs, breaking clinical consistency, or creating extra work for the team.

Why “lowest price” is the wrong first question

The right first question is: “Lowest price for what, exactly?”

Dental supplies are not a commodity in the way printer paper is. Two products can look similar but differ in performance, compatibility, shelf life, packaging size, or shipping constraints. If you only chase the lowest unit price, you can easily increase total cost by triggering:

  • more substitutions that confuse the team
  • more waste from expired product
  • more hidden spend from shipping thresholds and rush orders
  • more time spent correcting errors and returns

A better goal is to lower total cost while keeping clinical outcomes stable.

Step 1: Define the “exact match” before you compare anything

Price comparisons only work when you lock down what you are comparing.

For each product you want to price shop, define:

  • Manufacturer and product name
  • Exact item number or SKU
  • Size, count, and packaging configuration
  • Any clinical compatibility requirement (for example, matching bonding system accessories)
  • Acceptable alternates, if any

Without this, you may compare a 100-pack to a 500-pack, or compare two composites that are not clinically interchangeable. Those errors waste time and can create false savings.

Quick rule: If the packaging count is different, your unit cost comparison must be normalized.

Step 2: Choose a small “comparison basket” that represents real spend

Trying to compare every item in the office is overwhelming. Start with a basket of 25 to 40 items that represent a meaningful portion of your recurring spend.

A good basket includes:

  • Gloves (core sizes)
  • Sterilization pouches and indicators
  • Disinfectant wipes and barriers
  • Gauze, cotton rolls, bibs, cups
  • Suction tips and saliva ejectors
  • Prophy angles and common hygiene consumables
  • A limited set of restorative essentials used weekly

Avoid starting with rare specialty items. You want fast wins in high-volume categories.

Step 3: Compare total landed cost, not just list price

List price is only part of what you pay. Total landed cost includes:

  • Item price
  • Shipping and handling
  • Minimum order thresholds
  • Rush fees
  • Returns friction (time cost)
  • Backorder risk (clinical disruption cost)

Two vendors may have similar unit pricing, but one may consistently ship late or substitute items. That creates downstream costs that do not show up on a single invoice line.

Practical tip: When comparing vendors, keep a note for each one:

  • on-time delivery reliability
  • substitution frequency
  • ease of returns

Over time, that note becomes your vendor scorecard.

Step 4: Standardize what you buy before you try to optimize what you pay

Many practices try to save money while still carrying too many variations of the same product category. That makes comparisons messy and makes it easy to “save” in one area while overspending in another.

Before you price shop aggressively, reduce redundancy:

  • Choose one primary glove brand and one backup
  • Limit prophy paste options
  • Standardize paper goods and barriers
  • Align restorative systems as much as clinically feasible

Fewer SKUs makes price shopping far more effective because you concentrate volume and reduce waste.

Step 5: Use a two-tier comparison process: exact matches first, alternates second

A clean comparison follows this order:

Tier 1: Exact match comparisons

Compare the same product across vendors. This is the safest way to save because it does not change clinical behavior.

Tier 2: Controlled alternate comparisons

Only after you compare exact matches should you evaluate alternates. Alternates can save money, but they create change management work:

  • training
  • compatibility checks
  • team preference concerns
  • inventory transition plans

If you skip Tier 1, you may change products unnecessarily when the same product was already available cheaper elsewhere.

Step 6: Protect your practice from “alternate creep”

Alternate creep is when alternates get added but the original product never gets removed. This inflates inventory, increases expiration risk, and confuses staff.

A simple rule prevents it:

  • If an alternate becomes approved, the replaced item is phased out intentionally.

That means:

  • set a depletion plan for the old product
  • do not reorder the old product
  • store remaining old stock in one visible location so it gets used up first

This is also where reorder points matter. If you do not have clear reorder triggers, staff will continue reordering the old product out of habit.

A structured approach to reorder points and inventory levels supports cleaner transitions because the team is ordering based on defined minimums and maximums, not intuition.

Step 7: Build a simple spreadsheet that normalizes costs correctly

If you want a manual method that works, your spreadsheet should include:

  • Item name and SKU
  • Pack size (units per box)
  • Vendor A price per box
  • Vendor B price per box
  • Vendor C price per box
  • Unit cost (price per box divided by units)
  • Shipping estimate or shipping threshold note
  • Notes on substitution risk or lead time

This prevents the most common comparison error: picking the lowest box price without realizing it is a smaller pack.

Optional but useful: add a “monthly usage” column so you can estimate monthly cost impact. Saving $3 on an item used once a quarter does not matter. Saving $0.50 per patient on a daily consumable adds up quickly.

Step 8: Compare frequency-based spend, not just item-based savings

Once you have unit costs, look at savings through a usage lens.

Classify your basket items into:

  • High frequency: used daily or multiple times per day
  • Medium frequency: used weekly
  • Low frequency: used monthly or less

Then prioritize changes in this order:

  1. High frequency exact match savings
  2. High frequency alternate savings (if clinically safe)
  3. Medium frequency exact match savings
  4. Everything else

This approach saves time because it focuses energy where the spend actually lives.

Step 9: Use cycle counting to stop price shopping from turning into overstocking

A common side effect of finding “better deals” is ordering more than you need. Practices see a discount, buy too much, then discover the product expires or gets forgotten.

Cycle counting reduces this risk because it keeps inventory accurate and prevents “phantom shortages” that trigger extra purchases.

A workable cycle counting structure is:

  • weekly counts for a small set of critical, high-value items
  • monthly counts for medium items
  • quarterly spot checks for slow movers

A practical framework for cycle counting schedules helps practices avoid full shutdown inventories while still keeping reorder decisions grounded in reality.

Step 10: Create a quarterly “price review” rhythm instead of constant shopping

Constant price shopping drains staff time. A better model is a scheduled review:

  • Quarterly: re-price your basket items across vendors
  • Monthly: monitor only major spikes and substitutions
  • Weekly: reorder based on par levels, not on shopping impulses

This balances savings with operational sanity. It also reduces the risk that your team will substitute products randomly because they are constantly searching for “the best deal.”

Common mistakes that sabotage price comparisons

Mistake 1: Comparing different pack sizes without normalizing

Fix: always calculate unit cost.

Mistake 2: Switching products without a transition plan

Fix: define what gets replaced and how the old stock will be depleted.

Mistake 3: Chasing discounts by buying too much

Fix: set max levels and use cycle counting to keep inventory accurate.

Mistake 4: Letting substitutes become permanent by accident

Fix: any substitute triggers a decision: one-time exception or approved alternate.

Mistake 5: Ignoring time cost

Fix: measure staff time spent ordering and correcting errors, not just price savings.

Conclusion: The best comparison system is the one your team can repeat

Comparing dental supply prices is not a one-time project. The real savings come from a repeatable method that:

  • defines exact matches
  • measures total landed cost
  • prioritizes high-frequency items
  • controls alternates to prevent SKU creep
  • uses reorder points and cycle counting to prevent overbuying

If your practice turns price comparison into a quarterly habit supported by clear inventory controls, you can reduce supply spend while keeping the clinical experience consistent for both staff and patients.

Irish Game Developers have the power to reshape the future of video gaming | FÍS Games Summit 2026

Ireland’s unique cultural identity, mythology, and historical experience have the power to reshape the future of video gaming, delegates heard at the sixth annual FÍS Games Summit.

The summit, organised by Ardán and taking place in the Radisson Red Hotel, Galway City, on Friday 24th April, brought together the island’s game development community alongside international voices from across the industry.

Irish Stories for Irish Games

Irish game developer Spooky Doorway has won enormous critical acclaim for The Séance of Blake Manor, a gothic mystery set in 19th-century Ireland. The Summit heard the studio’s CEO, Paul Conway, make the case for authentic Irish storytelling in games — not simply games made in Ireland, but drawing on the depth and distinctiveness of Irish culture itself.

“Usually, video games have represented Irish culture very badly or poorly,” Mr Conway told delegates. “We wanted to make Irish video games. We didn’t just want to make video games made in Ireland. We wanted video games about Irish stories.”

He pointed to Irish mythology, folklore, themes of generational guilt, loss, colonialism, and regret as untapped territory: “Our history has everything we wanted to put into a game. There’s hidden gems that the rest of the world hasn’t seen, unmined depths.”

The Séance of Blake Manor also broke significant new ground in representation, featuring the first Irish Traveller character in a video game to be voiced by an Irish Traveller — a landmark moment for Ireland’s native ethnic minority community.

Spooky Doorway was also the standout winner at the IMIRT Awards, which took place as part of the Summit, and which celebrates the best of Irish game development and creativity on both sides of the border. The Séance of Blake Manor took home Game of the Year and Best Game Design, and was runner-up in both Best Narrative and Best Game Audio.

The Industry’s Reckoning with Diversity

Who gets to be seen in games — and who gets to make them — was among the summit’s most urgent themes. Sybil Collas, a narrative designer and interactive storytelling specialist with credits at Ubisoft, Warner Bros., Canal+, and We Are Social, brought fifteen years of hard-won experience to a talk that challenged the industry to look honestly at whose stories it has historically chosen to tell.

Collas argued for storytelling as a force for mental health and community, and called for richer, more intersectional character development that moves beyond the industry’s entrenched image of the default gamer. This work, they said, is “a creative opportunity and a social responsibility” — though they were candid about the personal cost of pushing for change from within large organisations. “Don’t exhaust yourself,” Collas advised. “You need to pick your battles to survive.”

The Craft Behind the Screen

Beyond the broader cultural conversation, the summit offered a deep dive into the disciplines that make games work. Anna Brandberg, Lead UX Designer on two of recent years’ most praised titles — Dune: Awakening and Metal: Hellsinger — made the case for user experience design as a foundational discipline rather than an afterthought, one that shapes every stage of development from initial concept to final testing.

Her message to designers was direct: “The experience you designed may not be what players want. You’re designing a game for your players, not for yourself.”

Nic Tringali, designer of The Banished Vault and the upcoming Amberspire, explored the interplay between visual language and systems design — and the way players construct their own meaning from the cues a game provides. “I’m always thinking about what a player is going to interpret from a system,” they said, pointing to the gap between designer intention and player experience as one of the richest creative spaces in the medium.

Gareth Damian Martin of Jumping Over the Age, the independent studio behind the widely praised In Other Waters and Citizen Sleeper, spoke with characteristic thoughtfulness about the creative process that drives genuinely original work. For Martin, the question is never simply what to make next, but something more instinctive and harder to name: “It’s not a question of what do I do next, it’s a question of what do I follow.”

Building an Industry Together

Closing the summit, Ardán CEO Alan Duggan underlined what the gathering itself represents for the Irish games sector. “By attending the Summit, you are choosing to invest in yourself, this community and in our industry,” he told attendees, “and potentially you’ll find collaborators, you’ll find conspirators, and people you can depend on.”